nanog mailing list archives
Re: Loose Source Routing
From: "David McGaugh" <david_mcgaugh () eli net>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 15:59:22 -0800
Thanks for all the great input, minus the somewhat uncivil comments of some! -Dave Randy Bush wrote:
What are people's feelings on loose source routing? The general sentiment around here is that it is a very evil thing. The reason I ask is that there is a certain network out there (who will remain nameless) who refuses to peer unless loose source routing is enabled. I can somewhat understand their reasoning (they can reroute traffic on OUR network as necessary)false. the reason is that our noc can debug your routing problem without going through the problems of getting intelligent cooperation from your noc. randy
-- +------------------------------+ Dave McGaugh, CCNA Peering & IP Backbone Engineer Electric Lightwave, Inc. E-mail: dmcgaugh () eli net Direct Dial: 360.816.3718 Fax: 360.816.3522 +------------------------------+
Attachment:
dmcgaugh.vcf
Description: Card for David McGaugh
Current thread:
- Loose Source Routing David McGaugh (Mar 06)
- Re: Loose Source Routing Jared Mauch (Mar 06)
- Re: Loose Source Routing Alan Hannan (Mar 06)
- Re: Loose Source Routing Randy Bush (Mar 06)
- Re: Loose Source Routing David McGaugh (Mar 06)
- RE: Loose Source Routing Walters (Mar 06)
- Re: Loose Source Routing Kevin Oberman (Mar 07)
- Re: Loose Source Routing John Hawkinson (Mar 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Loose Source Routing Mark Borchers (Mar 06)
- Re: Loose Source Routing smd (Mar 06)
- Re: Loose Source Routing Vadim Antonov (Mar 06)
- Re: Loose Source Routing Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 06)
- Re: Loose Source Routing John Hawkinson (Mar 07)
- Re: Loose Source Routing Vadim Antonov (Mar 06)
- Re: Loose Source Routing smd (Mar 06)
- Re: Loose Source Routing Alan Hannan (Mar 07)