nanog mailing list archives
RE: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play
From: Richard Welty <rwelty () vpnet com>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 15:21:58 -0500
Charles Sprickman [mailto:spork () inch com] wrote:
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Steve Rubin wrote:
patent-pending technology? oh brother.
Actually, that would be the part of it that lets users get to these new domains even if their ISP does not cooperate. Read the release again carefully. hint: browser plugin.
ok, here's the problem: if we take the press release as written (dangerous to do), then the design is inherently flawed, as the browser will be able to see the domains, but a copy of Eudora or a traditional FTP client wouldn't be able to. if we assume the press release is in error, then the "patented technology" might consist of a different name resolver for windows -- but i don't know how hard that substitution is to actually do, not being a windows hacker type. and of course, mac, un*x and linux users would be right out, unless they plan to serve that market with "patented technology" as well. whatever you may think of ICANN, this concept is still fairly brain damaged. richard
Current thread:
- Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play, (continued)
- Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Patrick Greenwell (Mar 06)
- Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Joe Provo (Mar 06)
- Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play lucifer (Mar 06)
- Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Patrick Greenwell (Mar 06)
- Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Eric A. Hall (Mar 06)
- Tower of Babbel Joseph T. Klein (Mar 06)
- Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Eric A. Hall (Mar 06)
- Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Adam Rothschild (Mar 07)
- RE: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Mike Batchelor (Mar 07)
- Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play Brian Russo (Mar 07)