nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engineering]
From: Fletcher E Kittredge <fkittred () gwi net>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:41:55 -0400
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001 16:08:13 -0400 Fletcher E Kittredge wrote:
Also, if the cable/dsl/wireless modem is a router, life becomes much simpler as one can just gather the necessary information via tracing. However, I am not sure requiring modems to be routers is a good thing...I think you should sit down and read the DOCSIS specifications carefully before you say things like this. If implemented correctly, it actually works, believe it or not. The modem does _not_ have to be a router in order for it to work.Ted; Thank you so much!! I will set right out to do so!
Ted; I haven't been able to figure your statement above out. I thought you were saying that given a client device MAC address, one could determine which cable modem MAC address was servicing that client MAC, even in the cases where the cable modem was just acting as a bridge. This is embarassing, but I have been spending time on the DOCSIS 1.0 spec (http://www.cablemodem.com/specifications.html), and I can't seem to find where this behavior is specified as required. Could you give me some hints as to which document it is in and which section? Given the DOCSIS specifications, the two mechanisms I can think of for yielding this information are SNMP and DHCP. In regards to DHCP, time spend with the DOCSIS spec, your excellent book and tcpdump says to me that it is not in the DCHPREQUEST packet, either as 'giaddr' or as any DHCP option I can find. Time with the RFCs and the DOCSIS spec have not yielded to me any SNMP object in any of the DOCSIS required SNMP MIB RFCs which would return all the the bridged MAC What am I missing? Your guidance is much appreciated. thanks, fletcher
Current thread:
- Re: Looking for x.org, (continued)
- Re: Looking for x.org Neil J. McRae (Jun 27)
- Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engineering] Miquel van Smoorenburg (Jun 26)
- Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engineering] Chris Adams (Jun 26)
- Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engineering] Wojtek Zlobicki (Jun 26)
- Message not available
- Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engineering] Wojtek Zlobicki (Jun 27)
- Message not available
- Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engineering] Wojtek Zlobicki (Jun 27)
- Message not available
- Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engineering] Wojtek Zlobicki (Jun 26)
- Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engineering] Charles Sprickman (Jun 26)
- Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engineering] Miquel van Smoorenburg (Jun 27)
- Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engineering] Fletcher E Kittredge (Jun 28)
- Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engineering] Greg A. Woods (Jun 28)
- Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engineering] Fletcher E Kittredge (Jun 28)
- Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engineering] Greg A. Woods (Jun 28)
- Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engineering] Fletcher E Kittredge (Jun 29)
- Re: Cable Modem [really responsible engineering] Greg A. Woods (Jun 29)