nanog mailing list archives
Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?)
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2001 10:32:42 -0700
i did not know abovenet was around in '89-90. thanks for the info.i'm ready to recant but i'd like to see the reference first.
i guess i can dig through the paper and fax you a uunet contract or bill from back then if you insist. but uunet was doing 95th on T1s from darned close to their start into IP. ask your ex-uunet coworkers, asp, joe, ... randy
Current thread:
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?), (continued)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Alex Rubenstein (Jun 02)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Geoff Huston (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Nipper, Arnold (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Alex Rubenstein (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Greg A. Woods (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) George Michaelson (Jun 07)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Joe Abley (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Paul Vixie (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Randy Bush (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Paul A Vixie (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Randy Bush (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Randy Bush (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) Alex Rubenstein (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile again (was RE: C&W Peering Problem?) jlewis (Jun 03)