nanog mailing list archives

Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23


From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck Nether net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 17:46:49 -0400


On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 02:38:32PM -0700, lucifer () lightbearer com wrote:
Can anyone verify whether Cisco still does BGP this way? (Propagate, then
kill origionating session). If so, it rather clearly answers the question
about how this managed to make it throughout the network...

        I'm fairly sure that is not the case anymore.

(For the record: I'm not trying to Cisco-bash here. All vendors have
problems, and when you have a huge market share, your problems tend to
show up much more obviously, when they appear. However, Cisco does still
have a huge market share, meaning this affected a whole lot of people,
if true... so, I'm curious).

        From what I can tell this time it was not ciscos fault.  It
appears that the vendor that had the problem just had an issue with
a specific "valid" announcement that others propogated to it.

        What is interesting is one could use this to see what
providers are using vendor "X" at exchange points.

        - Jared

-- 
Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from jared () puck nether net
clue++;      | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/  My statements are only mine.


Current thread: