nanog mailing list archives
Global BGP - 2001-06-23
From: lucifer () lightbearer com
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 14:05:36 -0700 (PDT)
Out of curiosity - did anyone see a duration of significanlt instability in the global routing tables on Saturday afternoon? Without violating NDA, all I can say is that it resembled a historic event involve a bad route, Ciscos, and Bay routers (only this time, it was a bad route, Ciscos, and <X> vendor whom I cannot name but is being soundly beaten with wet noodles to resolve the issue). The bad route, and instability, were seen across all of our transit vendors (all "household" names of transit service). Anyone else see this sort of event, or further details on the cause? -- *************************************************************************** Joel Baker System Administrator - lightbearer.com lucifer () lightbearer com http://www.lightbearer.com/~lucifer
Current thread:
- Global BGP - 2001-06-23 lucifer (Jun 24)
- RE: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 Matt Levine (Jun 24)
- Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 Brett Frankenberger (Jun 24)
- Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 lucifer (Jun 24)
- Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 Brett Frankenberger (Jun 24)
- Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 lucifer (Jun 25)
- Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 lucifer (Jun 25)
- Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 Jared Mauch (Jun 25)
- Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 lucifer (Jun 25)
- RE: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X's statement... Chance Whaley (Jun 26)
- RE: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 - Vendor X's statement... Matt Levine (Jun 26)
- Re: Global BGP - 2001-06-23 lucifer (Jun 24)