nanog mailing list archives
Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs
From: "Christopher A. Woodfield" <rekoil () semihuman com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 14:42:05 -0400
What I meant, and probably should have worded more clearly, is that by forcing DSL ISPs to use PPPoE which from what I understand is a consumer technology, SBC is the only provider who can offer other services over the DSL pair, such as ATM service or voice/video over IP. -C On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 01:35:59PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Christopher A. Woodfield <rekoil () semihuman com> said:If I'm reading this correctly, SBC is forcing ISPs that resell SBC's DSL access to go with PPPoE over ATM, thus potentially forcing businesses to buy DSL net access from SBC directly.Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see how PPPoA forces businesses to buy DSL elsewhere. -- Chris Adams <cmadams () hiwaay net> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
-- --------------------------- Christopher A. Woodfield rekoil () semihuman com PGP Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xB887618B
Current thread:
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs, (continued)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Bruce Robertson (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Derek Balling (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Derek Balling (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Bruce Robertson (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Jeff Mcadams (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Derek Balling (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Dee McKinney (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Derek Balling (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Steven J. Sobol (Jun 26)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 25)
- Re: SBC forcing new contract on ISPs Charles Sprickman (Jun 25)