Re: Intellectual Property Claim Service for .BIZ

[Gordon Cook <cook () cookreport com>]

why aren't you signing your nasty condescending note with your 
NeuLevel employee status Eric?


Eric Brunner-Williams                  NeuStar, Inc.
Senior Technical Industry Liaison      http://www.neustar.com
Phone: (Portland, ME) +1.207.xxx.xxxx  (Washington, DC) +1.202.533.2600/2975
smail: 1415 Forest Ave. 04103          1120 Vermont Ave. N.W., Ste 400, 20005
email: brunner () nic-naa net             ebw () neustar com


from another list yesterday

At 04:40 PM 6/12/01 -0400, you wrote:
>          One and the same.
>
>
> At 03:59 PM 6/12/2001 -0400, you wrote:
> > Is this the "native rights" Eric Brunner?

Fasten your seats then this is gonna be a rough ride.

I guess it's like what somebody told me about setting up a bar,
the first thing you do is get a big bouncer.


=======================


I'll leave it to others on Nanog to consider whether your ability to 
have a reasoned exchange of information fits the above description.

consider yourself filtered Eric  <plonk>




> Chuck,
>
> I'll stick to the factual errors.
>
> >  One, that you correctly predict all creative constructions of domain
> >  names that may conflict with your mark.
>
> The IP Claim service we deployed is for exact match, strcmp() returning 0.
>
> Your items two and three are speculative, and anyone can speculate, which
> may be the root problem.
>
> Your conclusion (based upon one factual error and two speculative claims)
> is contradicted by the experience with the URDP, and as the study was done
> by academics (and fairly interesting, covering the major modes of DRP and
> the outcome distributions) you may want to fix their methodology, data and
> conclusions [1].
>
> >  So, if you want my proposal ...
>
> Only 2 boundary conditions removed: existance of ICANN, existance of marks.
>
> Neat. I'd have gone for gravity myself, it is such a bother.
>
> >  I hope that was interesting enough.
>
> Fairly lame actually, on par with Jim Fleming's v8 cure for what ails the net
> as a reality-based proposal, and dull-as-ditchwater/common-as-crud as netzine
> sceanery.
>
> Do your "business associates and perhaps [your] customers" give a fig about
> your irrepressible vision and truth of DNS reform? Why? Are they bored?
>
> Feel free to have the last word, its your scam. Follow-ups to the NANFG list.
>
> Eric
>
> References:
>
> [1] Preliminary Report from Max Planck Institute on UDRP study, ICANN
>     DNSO Intellectual Property Constituency Meeting, Stockholm, 1 June
>     2001.


--


****************************************************************
The COOK Report on Internet, 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA
(609) 882-2572 (phone & fax) cook () cookreport com   Index to 9 years
 of the COOK  Report at http://cookreport.com          For info on new Ethernet
in the First Mile and 10 Gig E issue go to  http://cookreport.com/10.04.shtml
Single issues may be purchased for  $125 or $250 for single or group  use
****************************************************************