nanog mailing list archives
Re: Why so little traffic from C&W
From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 16:40:10 +0000 (UCT)
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 10:45:41PM +0100, Simon Lockhart wrote:I believe the latest common definition of tier 1 in that of an ISP with no transit.I believe that "Tier-1" no longer means anything. It was a term that had meaning when the government got out of the business of running NSFNet, and created "Tier-1 Providers" that connected to "Tier-2 Providers". At that time (if perhaps only for a fairly brief time) there were actual defined tiers, and they ment something.
There was never any governmental sanction of the term or concept of tier anything associate with the NSFnet or its transition. The term was coined in that timeframe by Vadim. --bill
Current thread:
- Why so little traffic from C&W Sean Donelan (Jun 06)
- Re: Why so little traffic from C&W Paul Vixie (Jun 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Why so little traffic from C&W Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 07)
- Re: Why so little traffic from C&W Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 07)
- Re: Why so little traffic from C&W J.D. Falk (Jun 07)
- Re: Why so little traffic from C&W Simon Lockhart (Jun 07)
- more tier 1 definitions was: Why so little traffic from C&W scott w (Jun 07)
- Re: Why so little traffic from C&W Leo Bicknell (Jun 08)
- Re: Why so little traffic from C&W bmanning (Jun 08)
- Re: Why so little traffic from C&W Rachel Warren (Jun 10)
- Re: Why so little traffic from C&W J.D. Falk (Jun 07)
- Re: Definition of Tier-1 RJ Atkinson (Jun 08)
- Re: Definition of Tier-1 E.B. Dreger (Jun 08)
- Re: Definition of Tier-1 Travis Pugh (Jun 08)
- non-op (Re: Definition of Tier-1) E.B. Dreger (Jun 11)
- Re: non-op (Re: Definition of Tier-1) Travis Pugh (Jun 11)
- Re: non-op (Re: Definition of Tier-1) J.D. Falk (Jun 11)
- Re: non-op (Re: Definition of Tier-1) Charles Sprickman (Jun 11)
- Re: non-op (Re: Definition of Tier-1) bmanning (Jun 11)
- Re: Definition of Tier-1 J.D. Falk (Jun 08)