nanog mailing list archives
Re: /24s run amuck again
From: Simon Lyall <simon.lyall () ihug co nz>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 21:27:02 +1200 (NZST)
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Richard A. Steenbergen wrote:
This mean over 57% of the routing table consists of /24s. So in order to facilitate getting this fixed, I have prepared a list of the worst offenders and their specific blocks which (most likely) have no reason for not being aggregated. If all of these entries could be aggregated (and I'm certain this simple script missed some), it would reduce the routing table by over 29,000 entries, to less the 78k. I think it's pretty obvious that a lot of these simply have no excuse. http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras/projects/ipaddr/24amuck.txt
I'd suggest you review your data. Checking our AS (7657) you list networks we havn't had for 6 months advertised to a peer we havn't had for 3 months. Not to mention you don't even list a bunch of /24s we are advertising (for various reasons (not all good)). -- Simon Lyall. | Newsmaster | Work: simon.lyall () ihug co nz Senior Network/System Admin | Postmaster | Home: simon () darkmere gen nz ihug, Auckland, NZ | Asst Doorman | Web: http://www.darkmere.gen.nz
Current thread:
- /24s run amuck again Richard A. Steenbergen (Jun 08)
- Re: /24s run amuck again Simon Lyall (Jun 08)
- RE: /24s run amuck again Michelle T (Jun 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: /24s run amuck again Karyn Ulriksen (Jun 08)
- RE: /24s run amuck again Richard A. Steenbergen (Jun 08)
- RE: /24s run amuck again Philip Smith (Jun 09)
- RE: /24s run amuck again Richard A. Steenbergen (Jun 09)
- RE: /24s run amuck again Randy Bush (Jun 09)
- RE: /24s run amuck again Richard A. Steenbergen (Jun 09)
- RE: /24s run amuck again Randy Bush (Jun 09)
- RE: /24s run amuck again Richard A. Steenbergen (Jun 09)
- RE: /24s run amuck again Randy Bush (Jun 09)
- RE: /24s run amuck again Richard A. Steenbergen (Jun 09)