nanog mailing list archives
Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue
From: Jeff Ogden <jogden () merit edu>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 10:50:59 -0400
At 10:04 AM -0400 6/5/01, Morris, Gary wrote:
What I find alarming about this is what is stopping CW from asking a prohibitive sum of money from other providers? Providers can't simply 'transit through somebody else' free of charge because ultimately somebody is paying for the transit rights.
And what I find alarming about this is that we purchase transit service from C&W and they no longer seem to be providing transit service that allows us to reach PSINet either directly or indirectly anymore. We've complained to C&W. They haven't responded yet. I am hoping that we don't need to get out our contract and read the fine print, but it may in fact come to that. (We are multihomed so we have some options, but that doesn't change anything in terms of the service we receive from C&W.)
-Jeff Ogden Merit
Current thread:
- PSI statement on C&W peering issue Sean Donelan (Jun 04)
- Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue Steve Meuse (Jun 04)
- Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue Christian Nielsen (Jun 04)
- RE: PSI statement on C&W peering issue Daniel Golding (Jun 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue Richard A. Steenbergen (Jun 04)
- Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue Morris, Gary (Jun 05)
- Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue Jeff Ogden (Jun 05)
- Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 05)
- Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue Jeff Ogden (Jun 05)