nanog mailing list archives
Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue
From: "Morris, Gary" <gmorris () Govolution com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 10:04:12 -0400
Good for CW. Companies shouldnt cut off peering with others and not think that one day it might just happen to them.
What I find alarming about this is what is stopping CW from asking a prohibitive sum of money from other providers? Providers can't simply 'transit through somebody else' free of charge because ultimately somebody is paying for the transit rights.
Current thread:
- PSI statement on C&W peering issue Sean Donelan (Jun 04)
- Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue Steve Meuse (Jun 04)
- Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue Christian Nielsen (Jun 04)
- RE: PSI statement on C&W peering issue Daniel Golding (Jun 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue Richard A. Steenbergen (Jun 04)
- Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue Morris, Gary (Jun 05)
- Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue Jeff Ogden (Jun 05)
- Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 05)
- Re: PSI statement on C&W peering issue Jeff Ogden (Jun 05)