Re: C&W Peering

[Travis Pugh <tpugh () shore net>]

On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Chris Adams wrote:

> We're connected to C&W, AT&T, and Sprint:
>
> hsvcore#s ip b 38.0.0.0
> BGP routing table entry for 38.0.0.0/8, version 402730
> Paths: (2 available, best #2)
>   Advertised to non peer-group peers:
>     216.180.95.209 216.180.116.1 216.180.119.54
>   1239 174, (aggregated by 174 38.1.10.8)
>     216.180.119.54 from 216.180.119.54 (216.180.119.54)
>       Origin IGP, metric 8, localpref 100, valid, internal, atomic-aggregate
>   7018 174, (aggregated by 174 38.1.3.39), (received & used)
>     12.125.208.5 from 12.125.208.5 (12.123.21.247)
>       Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external, atomic-aggregate, best
>
> No route to PSI through C&W.
> -- 
> Chris Adams <cmadams () hiwaay net>
> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
> I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.

route-views.oregon-ix.net concurs:

route-views.oregon-ix.net>sh ip bgp regex ^3561_174_

route-views.oregon-ix.net>

-travis