nanog mailing list archives
Re: C&W Peering
From: Chris Adams <cmadams () hiwaay net>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 16:23:44 -0500
Once upon a time, Christopher A. Woodfield <rekoil () semihuman com> said:
Unless, of course, CW or PSI has transit connectivity from someone. Can someone on either network do a BGP lookup and see if they're seeing each other's routes, and if so, through whom?
We're connected to C&W, AT&T, and Sprint: hsvcore#s ip b 38.0.0.0 BGP routing table entry for 38.0.0.0/8, version 402730 Paths: (2 available, best #2) Advertised to non peer-group peers: 216.180.95.209 216.180.116.1 216.180.119.54 1239 174, (aggregated by 174 38.1.10.8) 216.180.119.54 from 216.180.119.54 (216.180.119.54) Origin IGP, metric 8, localpref 100, valid, internal, atomic-aggregate 7018 174, (aggregated by 174 38.1.3.39), (received & used) 12.125.208.5 from 12.125.208.5 (12.123.21.247) Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external, atomic-aggregate, best No route to PSI through C&W. -- Chris Adams <cmadams () hiwaay net> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
Current thread:
- C&W Peering Moe Allen (Jun 04)
- Message not available
- Re: C&W Peering Moe Allen (Jun 06)
- Message not available
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: C&W Peering Sean Donelan (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Simon Lockhart (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Chris Adams (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Travis Pugh (Jun 04)
- Message not available
- Re: C&W Peering Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering E.B. Dreger (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Travis Pugh (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Eric A. Hall (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Travis Pugh (Jun 04)
- RE: C&W Peering David Schwartz (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering shane (Jun 05)
- Re: C&W Peering shane (Jun 05)
- Message not available
- Re: C&W Peering ken harris. (Jun 05)