nanog mailing list archives
RE: 95th Percentile = Lame
From: Joe Blanchard <jblanchard () wyse com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 21:08:30 -0700
Hmmm.. In reading this thread. Does this mean that if I send an 0xFFFF bit pattern to a network versus a 0x0000 pattern I'd be charged more for the energy consumption since all the 1's are high and consume more elecetric, and is there a larger charge for CA given the electric issues there? lol Well just had to throw that in since some of these comments are a bit far fetched.... just my 2¢s Happy Monday all. -Joe Blanchard
Current thread:
- RE: 95th Percentile = Lame Joe Blanchard (Jun 03)
- RE: 95th Percentile = Lame Randy Bush (Jun 03)
- Re: 95th Percentile = Lame Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: 95th Percentile = Lame Joe Blanchard (Jun 03)
- RE: 95th Percentile = Lame Andrew Odlyzko (Jun 04)
- RE: 95th Percentile = Lame Randy Bush (Jun 03)