nanog mailing list archives

RE: 95th Percentile = Lame


From: Joe Blanchard <jblanchard () wyse com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 21:08:30 -0700

Hmmm.. 

In reading this thread. Does this mean that if I send an 0xFFFF bit pattern
to a network versus a 0x0000 pattern I'd be charged more for the energy
consumption since all the 1's are high and consume more elecetric, and is
there a larger charge for CA given the electric issues there? 
lol
Well just had to throw that in since some of these comments are a bit far
fetched.... 
just my 2¢s 
Happy Monday all.
-Joe Blanchard

Current thread: