nanog mailing list archives
Re: crsnic whois updates
From: Adam McKenna <adam () flounder net>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 13:04:38 -0700
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 12:45:09PM -0700, Joseph McDonald wrote:
BT> NetSol obviously doesn't give a damn about whether or not whois is up to BT> date. They don't have to. Their lucrative monopoly was recently extended BT> for many more years. What's sad is that it would be fairly trivial for them to implement a real-time whois update. I don't know why they don't just do it.
Apparently NSOL thinks they are "special".. Even though my nameservers are registered with OpenSRS, NSOL thinks that I need to spend time (weeks, sometimes), sending them an updated "host" form every time I change an IP address. Luckily, the root servers reflect the correct nameserver IP addresses, even though NSOL's whois doesn't. But this still doesn't keep my customers from asking me why WHOIS doesn't show the correct nameserver information, and worrying that people won't be able to get to their website or send them mail. Of course, my answer to them is always "use a different registrar". Hopefully, eventually, enough people will leave NSOL that they'll start "caring". --Adam
Current thread:
- Re: SWIP update intervals (was: Re: Getting an AS and /18) Bohdan Tashchuk (Jul 03)
- crsnic whois updates Joseph McDonald (Jul 03)
- Re: crsnic whois updates Adam McKenna (Jul 03)
- Re: crsnic whois updates mike harrison (Jul 03)
- Re: crsnic whois updates Adam McKenna (Jul 03)
- Re: crsnic whois updates John Payne (Jul 04)
- RE: crsnic whois updates Mike Batchelor (Jul 06)
- RE: crsnic whois updates John Fraizer (Jul 06)
- Re: crsnic whois updates Adam McKenna (Jul 03)
- crsnic whois updates Joseph McDonald (Jul 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: SWIP update intervals (was: Re: Getting an AS and /18) Adam McKenna (Jul 03)