nanog mailing list archives

Re: Hard data on network impact of the "Code Red" worm?

From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 12:48:57 -0400

On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 04:16:12 PDT, Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>  said:

I would agree those people may have been severely affected.  But 350,000
hosts isn't that big of a number any more.  The Morris Internet Worm


That's 350K hosts that got infected *that we know about*.  I'd not be
surprised if a lot of other hosts got infected during the 9 hours CRv2
was on its burn stage that didn't happen to ping any of the sensor boxes
used to identify infected hosts.
-- 
                                Valdis Kletnieks
                                Operating Systems Analyst
                                Virginia Tech

Attachment: _bin
Description:

Current thread:

Hard data on network impact of the "Code Red" worm? Sean Donelan (Jul 30)
- Re: Hard data on network impact of the "Code Red" worm? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 30)
  - Re: Hard data on network impact of the "Code Red" worm? Larry Sheldon (Jul 30)
    - Re: Hard data on network impact of the "Code Red" worm? Steve Goldstein (Jul 30)
    - Re: Hard data on network impact of the "Code Red" worm? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 30)
- Re: Hard data on network impact of the "Code Red" worm? Randy Bush (Jul 30)
  - Re: Hard data on network impact of the "Code Red" worm? Wojtek Zlobicki (Jul 30)
  - Re: Hard data on network impact of the "Code Red" worm? Rafi Sadowsky (Jul 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Hard data on network impact of the "Code Red" worm? Sean Donelan (Jul 30)
- Re: Hard data on network impact of the "Code Red" worm? Sean Donelan (Jul 30)
- Re: Hard data on network impact of the "Code Red" worm? Wojtek Zlobicki (Jul 30)
  - Re: Hard data on network impact of the "Code Red" worm? Larry Sheldon (Jul 30)

(Thread continues...)