nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISP contracts and government intervention
From: "Christopher A. Woodfield" <rekoil () semihuman com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 12:04:01 -0400
Mitch, I got some fertlizer here...from real horses! -C On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 10:41:56AM -0400, Mitch Halmu wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, Daniel Golding wrote:"blackhat" seems a strong term for an ISP that wishes to operate without government interference. ("hats" are for hackers. I don't think you'll find many folks who wear such figurative headgear on NANOG)Some black hats illustrated here: http://www.dotcomeon.com/blackholed.html --Mitch NetSide
-- --------------------------- Christopher A. Woodfield rekoil () semihuman com PGP Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xB887618B
Current thread:
- ISP contracts and government intervention ethanpreston (Jul 01)
- RE: ISP contracts and government intervention Daniel Golding (Jul 01)
- RE: ISP contracts and government intervention Daniel Golding (Jul 01)
- RE: ISP contracts and government intervention Mitch Halmu (Jul 02)
- Re: ISP contracts and government intervention Christopher A. Woodfield (Jul 02)
- Re: ISP contracts and government intervention Mitch Halmu (Jul 02)
- RE: ISP contracts and government intervention Matt Wilbur (Jul 02)
- Re: ISP contracts and government intervention Adam Rothschild (Jul 02)
- RE: ISP contracts and government intervention Daniel Golding (Jul 01)