Re: Exodus Down

["David Howe" <DaveHowe () gmx co uk>]

"Derek Balling" <dredd () megacity org> wrote:
> It couldn't be "taken over" by anyone else without cash changing
> hands. It's a corporate asset of VA Linux Systems, Inc.  -- the Inc.
> is the important part there.
I thought SF was open source?
In which case, only the physical hardware (the servers) could be considered
an asset - the server software being Open Source and the data belonging to
the users.......
In any case, it is really the servers that makes SF a major resource -
almost any project/source management system would have done...