nanog mailing list archives
Re: SSM vs MSDP (was: IP Multicasting)
From: brandon () rd bbc co uk (BrandonButterworth)
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 08:11:53 GMT
Without sap/sdr capabilities, SSM will never take off.
I don't see why, nice to have but not required for it's likely market - replacing unicast streaming media
Having all the web pages out there are nice extras, but do not replace the needed builtin tools.
For the users web works fine at the moment and some content providors would prefer people to look at the pages as well as the stream Doesn't mean it wouldn't be nice to have it as well though some portals would hope not or wish to own it. brandon
Current thread:
- SSM vs MSDP (was: IP Multicasting) Bill Nickless (Feb 24)
- Re: SSM vs MSDP (was: IP Multicasting) Jared Mauch (Feb 24)
- Re: SSM vs MSDP (was: IP Multicasting) Marshall Eubanks (Feb 24)
- Re: SSM vs MSDP (was: IP Multicasting) Bill Nickless (Feb 24)
- Re: SSM vs MSDP (was: IP Multicasting) Hank Nussbacher (Feb 24)
- Re: SSM vs MSDP (was: IP Multicasting) Marshall Eubanks (Feb 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: SSM vs MSDP (was: IP Multicasting) BrandonButterworth (Feb 24)