nanog mailing list archives

Re:


From: Jeff Haas <jeffhaas () merit edu>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 15:18:25 -0500


On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 09:37:32AM -0800, Randy Bush wrote:
here i quibble.  i don't really like either reflectors or route servers.
let's ignore route servers.

:-)

so, rather than do the rr thing, which is labor intensive and a dead end in
the long run, just jump to routers that can handle it, like small 36xx (or
26xx if they have the ram, i really don't know that end of your products
well).

Many small providers aren't very good at filtering their routes in
the first place.  Sloppiness in a mini-nap is expected.
One person with a little clue and a route server can make _everyones_
lives easier in such a situation.

Scaling routers is relatively easy.  Scaling clue is harder. :-)

(Note that I wont disagree that in such a situation, full-mesh
 peering is a very viable option.)

randy

-- 
Jeffrey Haas - Merit RSng project - jeffhaas () merit edu


Current thread: