nanog mailing list archives
Re:
From: Jeff Haas <jeffhaas () merit edu>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 15:18:25 -0500
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 09:37:32AM -0800, Randy Bush wrote:
here i quibble. i don't really like either reflectors or route servers. let's ignore route servers.
:-)
so, rather than do the rr thing, which is labor intensive and a dead end in the long run, just jump to routers that can handle it, like small 36xx (or 26xx if they have the ram, i really don't know that end of your products well).
Many small providers aren't very good at filtering their routes in the first place. Sloppiness in a mini-nap is expected. One person with a little clue and a route server can make _everyones_ lives easier in such a situation. Scaling routers is relatively easy. Scaling clue is harder. :-) (Note that I wont disagree that in such a situation, full-mesh peering is a very viable option.)
randy
-- Jeffrey Haas - Merit RSng project - jeffhaas () merit edu
Current thread:
- Re:, (continued)
- RE: Barry Raveendran Greene (Feb 24)
- RE: Randy Bush (Feb 24)
- Re: Jeff Haas (Feb 24)