nanog mailing list archives

Re: UUNET peering policyy

From: "Majdi S. Abbas" <msa () samurai sfo dead-dog com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 02:47:08 -0800


On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 09:47:47AM +0000, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:

Hmm, what are they trying to prove? They want to own the Internet no
doubt. I'd prefer to pay another like Genuity for transit to UUNET than
pay them direct and feed their appetite for power.


        Because, as we all know, Genuity has a much more generous
peering policy....

        --msa

Current thread:

UUNET peering policy Barrows, Jeff (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Jan-Ahrent Czmok (Feb 24)
  - Re: UUNET peering policy Simon Lockhart (Feb 24)
  - Re: UUNET peering policy Deepak Jain (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Basil Kruglov (Feb 24)
  - Re: UUNET peering policy Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 24)
    - Re: UUNET peering policy John Fraizer (Feb 24)
    - Re: UUNET peering policyy Majdi S. Abbas (Feb 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: UUNET peering policy Sean Donelan (Feb 24)
  - OT - VPN help Stephen Burd (Feb 24)
    - Re: OT - VPN help Brian W. (Feb 24)
    - Re: OT - VPN help jlewis (Feb 24)
    - Re: OT - VPN help jeremiah (Feb 24)
  - Re: UUNET peering policy Rodney Joffe (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy Jeff . Hodges (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy smd (Feb 24)
- Re: UUNET peering policy smd (Feb 24)
  - Re: UUNET peering policy Rodney Joffe (Feb 24)

(Thread continues...)