nanog mailing list archives
Operate until failure
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: 8 Jan 2001 01:40:45 -0800
Is there any consistency among network operators how they operate their networks when they know a possibility of imminent failure exists? 1. Do you attempt to preserve service as long as possible, including running equipment to the point of destruction? 2. Do you attempt to minimize recovery time by shutting down equipment to a "safe" condition before failure? If you are running a database/transaction oriented system, I would expect you want to put the database into a stable condition. On the other hand, if you are operating mostly communication equipment, you would want to leave it operating as long as possible. I'm aware of a variety of proprietary software shutdown programs associated with UPS vendors. But I'm wondering do any "open standards" exist for initiating soft shutdowns?
Current thread:
- Operate until failure Sean Donelan (Feb 24)
- Re: Operate until failure Nathan Stratton (Feb 24)
- Re: Operate until failure Eric Whitehill (Feb 24)
- Re: Operate until failure Shawn McMahon (Feb 24)
- Re: Operate until failure Andy Walden (Feb 24)
- Re: Operate until failure Shawn McMahon (Feb 24)
- Re: Operate until failure Shawn McMahon (Feb 24)
- Re: Operate until failure Eric Whitehill (Feb 24)
- Re: Operate until failure Nathan Stratton (Feb 24)
- Re: Operate until failure Henry Yen (Feb 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Operate until failure Sean Donelan (Feb 24)