nanog mailing list archives

Re: T3 Latency


From: Charles Scott <cscott () gaslightmedia com>
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 11:31:53 -0500 (EST)



On Sat, 17 Feb 2001, Nipper, Arnold wrote:

Chuck,

should read 130mi/msec I guess. Which would end up with ~7msec per
1000miles.

Arnold

Arnold:
  Yep, that's about what I figured, which means that we're seeing
something like 3000 miles of fiber, or somewhat less depending on the
latency of any interconnecting equipment. Funny for a path that's about
300 miles line of site and perhaps 500-600 they way I think they have it
running.

Chuck




Current thread: