nanog mailing list archives
Re: T3 Latency
From: Charles Scott <cscott () gaslightmedia com>
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 11:31:53 -0500 (EST)
On Sat, 17 Feb 2001, Nipper, Arnold wrote:
Chuck, should read 130mi/msec I guess. Which would end up with ~7msec per 1000miles. Arnold
Arnold: Yep, that's about what I figured, which means that we're seeing something like 3000 miles of fiber, or somewhat less depending on the latency of any interconnecting equipment. Funny for a path that's about 300 miles line of site and perhaps 500-600 they way I think they have it running. Chuck
Current thread:
- Re: T3 Latency, (continued)
- Re: T3 Latency Wayne Bouchard (Feb 24)
- Re: T3 Latency Charles Scott (Feb 24)
- RE: T3 Latency Aaron Moreau-Cook (Feb 24)
- Re: T3 Latency Nipper, Arnold (Feb 24)
- Re: T3 Latency Deepak Jain (Feb 24)
- Re: T3 Latency Charles Scott (Feb 24)
- Re: T3 Latency Jeff Mcadams (Feb 24)
- Re: T3 Latency Charles Scott (Feb 24)
- Re: T3 Latency dave o'leary (Feb 24)
- Re: T3 Latency Charles Scott (Feb 24)
- Re: T3 Latency Charles Scott (Feb 24)