nanog mailing list archives

Re: T3 Latency


From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () research att com>
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 11:19:09 -0500


In message <Pine.LNX.4.10.10102171056510.4084-100000 () merlin noc adelphia net>, 
Paul Bradford writes:

Charles,
  One thing I have a hard time explaining to some customers is that
latency is one thing....  what does it tell me... it tells me that from
one hop to another things are a bit slow.... the real important thing is
how are you're throughput speeds... I started a thread a while back asking
a similar question... is ping/traceroute a good measurement of throughput
on the link?  the unanimous response was use pathchar or mtr or ttcp which
all give you a better guestimate of how your link is doing performance
wise..

Latency and packet loss both put an upper bound on throughput.  See,
for example, http://www.acm.org/sigcomm/sigcomm98/tp/abs_25.html
or draft-ietf-pilc-error-06.txt



                --Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb




Current thread: