nanog mailing list archives
Re: Automated DLR conflict detection
From: "Stephen Sprunk" <ssprunk () cisco com>
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 10:11:14 -0600
Thus spake "EA Louie" <elouie () yahoo com>
That may have been true during your genre of CCIE's, but not with the
latest
round of CCIE's, my friends... you should see the posts I see on the ccie lab mailing lists. Its enough to scare even me, and I don't scare easily.
The people studying for CCIE can be scary. The failure rate is extremely high, and most (but unfortunately not all) of the people who pass are reasonably clueful.
The latest round of study materials is creating a "puppy mill" of CCIEs - inexperienced, money-hungry, power-conscious, and absolutely clueless. I wouldn't give most of them the enable passwords to my routers...
A certification does not absolve you from due diligence during the hiring process. I've turned down a few CCIE applicants for lack of clue myself. S
Current thread:
- RE: Automated DLR conflict detection, (continued)
- RE: Automated DLR conflict detection Sean Donelan (Dec 30)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Steven M. Bellovin (Dec 29)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Sean Donelan (Dec 29)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection David Lesher (Dec 29)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Howard C. Berkowitz (Dec 30)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Jake Khuon (Dec 30)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Sean Donelan (Dec 30)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection scott (Dec 30)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Jesper Skriver (Dec 30)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection EA Louie (Dec 31)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Stephen Sprunk (Dec 31)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection Sean Donelan (Dec 29)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection mike harrison (Dec 30)
- RE: Automated DLR conflict detection James (Dec 30)
- RE: Automated DLR conflict detection Sean Donelan (Dec 30)
- Re: Automated DLR conflict detection EA Louie (Dec 31)
- RE: Automated DLR conflict detection mike harrison (Dec 31)