nanog mailing list archives
[OT] RE: a question about the economics of peering
From: Rafi Sadowsky <rafi-nanog () meron openu ac il>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 09:32:05 +0200 (IST)
On Sat, 1 Dec 2001, Hitesh Patel wrote:
There is also an important reason to be connected at several exchange points: reliability. If you just have one transit provider, you're more vulnerable than with one transit provider plus a variety of peerings, which will still carry at least part of the traffic if the main provider fails.
Under some definitions a transit free [IN]SP is Tier-1 - so you can tell your customers you have a Tier one as your fall-back - right ? ( ;-)
-- Rafi
Current thread:
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Simon Lockhart (Dec 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Nigel Titley (Dec 01)
- Re: a question about the economics of peering Stephane Bortzmeyer (Dec 01)
- RE: a question about the economics of peering Hitesh Patel (Dec 01)
- [OT] RE: a question about the economics of peering Rafi Sadowsky (Dec 01)