nanog mailing list archives
RE: multi-homing fixes
From: Patrick Greenwell <patrick () cybernothing org>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Randy Bush wrote:
I don't think multhoming needs to be limited, currently. The size of the routing table is increasing at a more or less linear rate, now.please look at slides 11 and 15 of <http://psg.com/~randy/010809.ptomaine.pdf> the /24s of small multihomers is half the routing table (see geoff's data) and is growing radially (if you are silly enough not to filter that stuff).
You mean there are more smaller guys than larger ones? Bogggle.
Current thread:
- Re: multi-homing fixes, (continued)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Leo Bicknell (Aug 24)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Daniel Golding (Aug 24)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Leo Bicknell (Aug 24)
- Re: multi-homing fixes bmanning (Aug 24)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Christopher A. Woodfield (Aug 25)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Alex Bligh (Aug 25)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Howard C. Berkowitz (Aug 25)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 25)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Andreas Plesner Jacobsen - Tiscali (Aug 25)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Alex Bligh (Aug 25)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Patrick Greenwell (Aug 24)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Steve Noble (Aug 24)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Leo Bicknell (Aug 24)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Steve Noble (Aug 24)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Randy Bush (Aug 24)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Steve Noble (Aug 24)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Brian Whalen (Aug 24)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Steve Noble (Aug 24)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Randy Bush (Aug 24)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Paul Schultz (Aug 24)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Randy Bush (Aug 24)