nanog mailing list archives
Re: multi-homing fixes
From: Daniel Hagerty <hag () linnaean org>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 19:07:46 -0400
Multi-homing is here to stay, in a big way. It will only become more popular, no matter how good the ISP's become, for a number of reasons. Any future protocol or policy discussions should take this as a given.
Please don't confuse "I need more than one pipe into the internet" with "my organization must place its prefixes into the default free zone". It is possible to effectively use multiple pipes into many ISPs without the cost to all of us that introducing your prefix into the DFZ has.
Current thread:
- multi-homing fixes Irwin Lazar (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Vijay Gill (Aug 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: multi-homing fixes Roeland Meyer (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Leo Bicknell (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Daniel Hagerty (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Vijay Gill (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Daniel Hagerty (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Vijay Gill (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Joel Baker (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Vijay Gill (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Leo Bicknell (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes John Fraizer (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Brian Whalen (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Joe Abley (Aug 23)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Brian Whalen (Aug 23)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Daniel Golding (Aug 24)