nanog mailing list archives

Re: Ethernet NAPs (was Re: Miami ...)


From: RJ Atkinson <rja () inet org>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 11:58:54 -0400


At 11:14 23/08/01, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
On a GigE interface with jumbo frames where the other side on the
same ethernet might not support jumbo frames that is probably not
the case. The packet will simply get dropped and the sender will
never know why it was dropped.

        Folks sending anything larger than IEEE standard frame sizes
on any Ethernet need to be sure to re-configure all the equipment
accordingly and test the whole subnet out thoroughly.  For now, 
there seems to be no substitute for that (and yes, it is 
a fair bit of work).  As near as I can tell, all switches ship
with IEEE-standard MTU as the default, so require manual operator
reconfiguration to support any larger frame size.

Ran
rja () inet org


Current thread: