nanog mailing list archives

Re: Ethernet NAPs (was Re: Miami ...)


From: miquels () cistron-office nl (Miquel van Smoorenburg)
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 11:27:05 +0000 (UTC)


In article <Pine.BSF.4.20.0108221717430.8992-100000 () alive znep com>,
Marc Slemko  <marcs () znep com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Leo Bicknell wrote:

_ALL_ devices on a layer-2 fabric need to have the same MTU.  That
means if there are any FastEthernet or Ethernet connected members
1500 bytes is it.  It also means if you pick a larger value (4470,
9k) _ALL_ members must use the same value.

If you don't, the behavior is simple.  A 9k MTU GigE arps for a
1500 byte FastEthernet host.  Life is good.  The TCP handshake
completes, life is good.  TCP starts to send a packet, putting a
9k frame on the wire.  Depending the switch, the switch either
drops it as over MTU for the FastEthernet, or the FastEthernet card
cuts it off at 1500 bytes, and counts it as an errored frame
(typically with a jabber or two afterwards) and no data flows.

Well, the reasoning "why" is a bit more complex than that...  The
TCP handshake will result in the FE host saying "hey, I can do a
max 1460 byte mss".  The other host with a larger MTU won't send
larger packets than remote MSS + 40 bytes header over that TCP
connection, end of story.

So it's simply waiting for a routing vendor that sets the MTU
per endpoint based on the MSS in the TCP handshake for the
BGP session.

Mike.
-- 
"Answering above the the original message is called top posting. Sometimes
 also called the Jeopardy style. Usenet is Q & A not A & Q." -- Bob Gootee


Current thread: