nanog mailing list archives

RE: Covad, Chapter 11 !


From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2001 22:38:44 -0700


Some bond-holders can agree in principle. But, it takes a judge to allow
them to go to *their* backers and help *them* pitch the deal.

From: Christopher A. Woodfield [mailto:rekoil () semihuman com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 11:06 AM

I think the one exception to the rule in Covad's case is that 
Covad seems 
to have their reorg plan already in place and with the 
blessing of the 
majority, if not all, of their bondholders. I have no experience with 
bankruptcy law, but given the fact that the debt-retiring 
deal has been 
made, where is the need to file Chapter 11? To flush out the 
bondholders 
who haven't agreed to the stock-for-debt deal?

-C 

On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 08:41:07AM -0700, Roeland Meyer wrote:

From: up () 3 am [mailto:up () 3 am]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 7:57 AM

On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, deeann mikula wrote:

On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Smith, Rick wrote:

Just found this...

http://www.internetweek.com/story/INW20010807S0008

i read a similar article y'day, and that was the first 
that i had
heard mention of rhythms going down.  either i was too busy 
pulling my
hair out last month or they were really good about 
keeping it quiet.
*sigh*

looks like verizon is gonna be the only xdsl provider 
left solvent
when the dust settles.  how scary is that, and how predictable?

Although this may well ultimately prove true, people do 
realize that
filing for chapter 11 is not synonymous with going out of 
business,
right?

Show me one case, in the xDSL CLEC business where this has 
held true. Thus
far, *every* one of them, that has filed CH11, has gone out 
of business
within 30 days, as near as I can tell. The track record is 
pretty dismal.

-- 
---------------------------
Christopher A. Woodfield              rekoil () semihuman com

PGP Public Key: 
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xB887618B


Current thread: