nanog mailing list archives
RE: multi-homing fixes
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 19:12:19 +0200 (CEST)
Sorry for the late reply. On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Randy Bush wrote:
the /24s of small multihomers is half the routing table (see geoff's data)
This can't possibly be correct. The last figure I read was that there are about 70k /24s. There are about 21k AS numbers out there. This means that by far most of the announcements, including /24s, are the result of lack of CIDR. Either because ISPs have a relatively large number of PA blocks (address conservation) or because of lack of aggregation.
Current thread:
- RE: multi-homing fixes, (continued)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Patrick Greenwell (Aug 27)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 28)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Charles Sprickman (Aug 27)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Randy Bush (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Leo Bicknell (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Mark Radabaugh (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixes John Fraizer (Aug 28)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Mark Radabaugh - Amplex (Aug 28)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 24)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Howard C. Berkowitz (Aug 24)
- RE: multi-homing fixes Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 29)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Clayton Fiske (Aug 29)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 29)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Henry Yen (Aug 24)
- RE: multi-homing fixes David Schwartz (Aug 24)
- RE: multi-homing fixes David Schwartz (Aug 24)
- Re: multi-homing fixes Majdi S. Abbas (Aug 24)