nanog mailing list archives

Re: RIP and RIPv2, "The glue that makes the internet work"


From: Ulf Zimmermann <ulf () Alameda net>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 16:07:42 -0700


On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 02:44:50AM +0000, bmanning () vacation karoshi com wrote:

      POP quiz!

 What was/is the largest production network (in number of end nodes) that
 used/uses RIP as the IGP?

I have worked in an enviroment with over 12,000 nodes, which used RIPv1
and class B address space. And it was a pain, the software/hardware
engineers who original built that stuff didn't want to give up
control.


 What was/is the largest production network (in number of end nodes) that
 used/uses static routing as the IGP?

      ---------------------------------------------------------
 
That was last month's issue. I chuckled too. But, for a small end-point LAN,
it's not bad. Consider it appropriate tech, applied in appropriate places.
Even fully static routes aren't bad, on small enough networks.

-----Original Message-----
From: John M . Brown [mailto:jmbrown () ihighway net]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 6:51 PM
To: nanog () merit edu
Subject: RIP and RIPv2, "The glue that makes the internet work"



Latest Linux Mag has this really nice long article about how
RIP and its new version RIPv2 is the GLUE that makes the internet
work.  

I almost fell down on that.

Oh, wait, I do know a couple of exchange points that wanted to or are
running RIP.  No REALLY!!

jmbrown





-- 
Regards, Ulf.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Ulf Zimmermann, 1525 Pacific Ave., Alameda, CA-94501, #: 510-865-0204


Current thread: