nanog mailing list archives
Re: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20)
From: "Richard A. Steenbergen" <ras () e-gerbil net>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 22:31:07 -0400 (EDT)
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Craig Partridge wrote:
Stepping back for a moment -- the answer, clearly, is yes sometime in the next few years you'll be able to route gigabits through a PC platform. Having been down this path a few times, I think you underestimate the difficulty and are a couple of years too early, but what the heck, if you want to, go ahead and build one. At minimum, we'll all learn something from your experience and hey, you might succeed. Then be prepared to fight to maintain your turf against $200 ASIC based 4-port gigabit ethernet routers... :-)
Or maybe you tried it a few years too early. It really IS that easy to build a simple Gigabit level router with basic functionality. Your arguements have not come close to disproving the potential to build a very Cisco-like distributed software based networking device for reasonable prices. If we weren't getting jerked around with gige ports on a router costing $20,000, I don't think we'd be having this discussion. I'm not seriously advocating we all run out and try to build an entirely off the shelf PC-based routing platform which can compete with Cisco or Juniper. But this proves the point that the gap in technology is really not as extreme as vendors would have you believe, yet they continue to sell us equipment so expensive you'd think it the chassis was made of gold. -- Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177 (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)
Current thread:
- RE: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20), (continued)
- RE: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20) David Schwartz (Apr 10)
- RE: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20) alex (Apr 10)
- RE: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20) David Schwartz (Apr 11)
- Re: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20) Matt Zimmerman (Apr 11)
- Re: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20) Craig Partridge (Apr 11)
- Re: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20) Brett Frankenberger (Apr 11)
- Re: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20) Richard A. Steenbergen (Apr 10)
- Re: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20) Rafi Sadowsky (Apr 11)
- Re: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20) Craig Partridge (Apr 10)
- Re: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20) Greg Maxwell (Apr 10)
- Re: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20) Richard A. Steenbergen (Apr 10)
- Re: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20) Peter Galbavy (Apr 11)
- Re: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20) Bora Akyol (Apr 10)
- Re: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20) Michael C . Wu (Apr 16)
- Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 Dan Hollis (Apr 10)
- Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 Paul Timmins (Apr 10)