nanog mailing list archives
Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20
From: Paul Timmins <paul () timmins net>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 20:24:34 -0400
/me grabs PCMCIA NIC from dresser, inserts it, ifconfig eth1 x.x.x.x, then removes it. *Smirk* Of course, I am not suggesting you should run a router on a PCMCIA or even a laptop, or even an i386 machine... With the right backplane, and possibly ASIC's in the high end models, you *can* do routing in linux. Not that I am suggesting you should, or the right backplane and interface is available currently, but never say never. Hell, even tivo runs linux.... Perhaps this should have a different thread, or just die off. No, you shouldn't use i386 boxen for any integral part of the internet fabric, but who is to say that a variant of linux running zebra won't someday be the device of choice on some future (maybe already in development behind the closed doors of some startup with a clue) hardware? -Paul Roeland Meyer wrote:
From: Christopher A. Woodfield [mailto:rekoil () electro semihuman com] Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 2:15 PMOh, and when you can (a) have Linux shut down a failing interface card on the fly and keep humming along, and (b) be able to replace said card without shutting down, lemme know.IMHO, you are being short-sighted. Linux doesn't just run on PC boxen. That was my point earlier about the S/390. You assume too much. BTW, let's see you do the same thing with Sun gear, even Netras. How about hot-swapping a blade in a Cisco Catalyst 6509(not sure, here. I usually shut 'em down to do that.)? BTW, if you can find the hot-swap gear you want to run then I can probably get Linux to run on it (it just takes a while). Linux runs everywhere from Pal Pilots to S/390s (has any one seen it on a Sun e10K yet?) In this day and age, such absolute statements are a little hazardous. Their shelf-life, even if true, is measured in micro-secs. -- The only absolute is that there are no absolutes.
Current thread:
- Re: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20), (continued)
- Re: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20) Rafi Sadowsky (Apr 11)
- Re: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20) Craig Partridge (Apr 10)
- Re: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20) Greg Maxwell (Apr 10)
- Re: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20) Richard A. Steenbergen (Apr 10)
- Re: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20) Peter Galbavy (Apr 11)
- Re: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20) Bora Akyol (Apr 10)
- Re: gigabit router (was Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20) Michael C . Wu (Apr 16)
- Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 Dan Hollis (Apr 10)
- Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 mike harrison (Apr 10)
- Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 Paul Timmins (Apr 10)
- Re: Getting a "portable" /19 or /20 Greg Maxwell (Apr 10)