nanog mailing list archives

Re: HR 4445 Reciprocal Compensation


From: David Lesher <wb8foz () nrk com>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 09:36:23 -0400 (EDT)


Unnamed Administration sources reported that William Allen Simpson said:


"To exempt from reciprocal compensation requirements telecommunications 
traffic to the Internet. "

Anybody know about this?  Seems like it kills payments by ILECS to CLECs 
for dialups, when the calls are to an ISP.  Note, only _TO_ an ISP; 
folks wanting to provide voice are still required to pay ILECs for 
traffic _from_ an ISP.

Is this the "ILECs put ISPs out of business" act?

Yes. 

Per folks in telecom regulation field; that's exactly what
the Bells want. And they all pulling out all the stops,
lobby-wise.

They screwed up BIG time by *demanding* recip comp. They now want
the Emperor's New Clothes to correct that.




-- 
A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz () nrk com
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433



Current thread: