nanog mailing list archives
Re: decreased caching efficiency?
From: Andrew Bangs <andrewb () demon net>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 14:54:43 +0100
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 12:12:36PM -0700, Majdi S. Abbas wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 06:36:03PM +0100, Andrew Bangs wrote:5. There's NOTHING in it for the website owner, other than the possibility that SOME pages might display faster for SOME users.
No, I didn't write that. I quoted it in reply to Daniel Senie. Regards, Andrew -- andrewb () demon net
Current thread:
- decreased caching efficiency? Christian Kuhtz (Oct 19)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Adrian Chadd (Oct 19)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? John Fraizer (Oct 19)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Daniel Senie (Oct 19)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Patrick Greenwell (Oct 19)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Adrian Chadd (Oct 19)
- Message not available
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Adrian Chadd (Oct 19)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? John Fraizer (Oct 19)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Ian Cooper (Oct 20)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Adrian Chadd (Oct 19)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Andrew Bangs (Oct 19)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Majdi S. Abbas (Oct 19)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Andrew Bangs (Oct 20)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? John Fraizer (Oct 20)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? John Fraizer (Oct 20)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Scott Gifford (Oct 19)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? William Allen Simpson (Oct 20)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Dana Hudes (Oct 20)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? William Allen Simpson (Oct 20)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Dana Hudes (Oct 20)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? William Allen Simpson (Oct 20)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? Dana Hudes (Oct 20)
- Re: decreased caching efficiency? William Allen Simpson (Oct 20)