nanog mailing list archives
Re: UUNet?
From: Alex Rubenstein <alex () nac net>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 17:38:33 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
As is: http://www.nac.net/outages.asp which, if I could find the link, goes back to 1995... On Fri, 26 May 2000, Martin Cooper wrote:
Steve Kann <stevek () SteveK COM> writes:I have to say, that in my experience, the only company who practices full disclosure is AboveNet. Even to outsiders, they have the current capacity and usage levels of just about every single link in their network, as well as their tech announcements archive open to the public. I've seen other "pretty" network status pages from providers, but none show you the useful information you need.INSnet (admittedly not a tier-1) has a pretty neat policy on disclosure, even including a detailed description of the fixes for problems as well as the causes of them, which is nice. See <URL:http://www1.insnet.net/> for an idea of it. M.
Current thread:
- UUNet? Jeff Wheat (May 24)
- Re: UUNet? deeann mikula (May 24)
- Message not available
- Re: UUNet? Paul Froutan (May 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: UUNet? Andrew Lee (May 24)
- Re: UUNet? Sean Donelan (May 25)
- Re: UUNet? Brian Wallingford (May 26)
- Re: UUNet? Alex Rubenstein (May 26)
- Re: UUNet? Steve Kann (May 26)
- Re: UUNet? Martin Cooper (May 26)
- Re: UUNet? Alex Rubenstein (May 26)
- Re: UUNet? Peter Galbavy (May 29)
- Re: UUNet? Sean Donelan (May 26)
- Re: UUNet? Steve Kann (May 26)
- Re: UUNet? Jeff Haas (May 26)
- Re: UUNet? Peter Galbavy (May 29)
- Re: UUNet? Steve Kann (May 26)