nanog mailing list archives
RE: CIDR Report
From: wolfgang () whnet com (Wolfgang Henke)
Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 10:15:45 -0700 (PDT)
In any case, I think the point is made that we can talk all we want about how we want <insert router vendor name here> to provide a truly high-end router that solves everything, but the reality of the cost pressure does need to be considered....That is one major point, maybe the entire point.
This suggests a generally flatter architecture, maybe parallel. Still remember the supercomputer discussions a few years back when experts argued if either KSR or Thinking Machines is going to be *the* big win? And today when you need a lot of processing e.g. for rendering, you simply stick a couple dozen Pentiums on a fast switched ethernet.
Current thread:
- RE: CIDR Report, (continued)
- RE: CIDR Report Roeland Meyer (E-mail) (May 15)
- RE: CIDR Report Rodney L Caston (May 15)
- fighting cidr dead ending (was: RE: CIDR Report) Dmitri Krioukov (May 15)
- RE: fighting cidr dead ending (was: RE: CIDR Report) Dmitri Krioukov (May 15)
- Re: CIDR Report Randy Bush (May 15)
- Re: CIDR Report jlewis (May 15)
- RE: CIDR Report Roeland Meyer (E-mail) (May 17)
- Re: CIDR Report Valdis . Kletnieks (May 17)
- RE: CIDR Report Roeland Meyer (E-mail) (May 17)
- RE: CIDR Report Roeland Meyer (E-mail) (May 17)
- Re: CIDR Report Craig Partridge (May 17)
- Monitoring BGP Sessions Alison Gudgeon (May 17)
- Re: Monitoring BGP Sessions Neil J. McRae (May 18)