nanog mailing list archives
Re: more-specifics in class B space?
From: Deepak Jain <deepak () ai net>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 20:36:57 -0500 (EST)
whois -h rr.level3.net 63.0.0.0 % RIPEdb(3.0.0a13) with ISI RPSL extensions route: 63.0.0.0/13 descr: UUNET, An MCI Worldcom Company 3060 Williams Drive Fairfax VA 22031 USA origin: AS701 mnt-by: MAINT-AS701 changed: juzer () UU NET 19981110 source: RADB
Is there something inherently wrong about this that I am not seeing? Its not like UUNET is in there as 63.0.0.0/8. Or maybe its late in the week for me to make any sense of routing registry entries. Thanks, Deepak Jain AiNET
Current thread:
- more-specifics in class B space? Tom Spindler (Mar 22)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Jim Mercer (Mar 22)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Randy Bush (Mar 22)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Jim Mercer (Mar 22)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Randy Bush (Mar 22)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Randy Bush (Mar 22)
- Message not available
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Jim Mercer (Mar 22)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Jim Mercer (Mar 22)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Joe Provo - Network Architect (Mar 22)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Brian Wallingford (Mar 22)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Marc Slemko (Mar 24)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Jeremy Porter (Mar 24)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Deepak Jain (Mar 24)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Larry Snyder (Mar 24)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Jeremy Porter (Mar 25)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Patrick Greenwell (Mar 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Sean Donelan (Mar 23)