nanog mailing list archives
Re: RFC 1918
From: Mark Milhollan <mlm () ftel net>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 13:06:07 -0700
On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 12:01:25PM -0400, Shawn McMahon wrote:
traceroute to www.everybuddy.com (209.16.236.3), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets <snip> 12 p1-0.tamqfl1-cr4.bbnplanet.net (4.24.7.186) 50.724 ms 49.658 ms 50.428 ms 13 p0-0.itctampa.bbnplanet.net (4.24.176.6) 44.791 ms 44.299 ms 45.233 ms 14 10.254.0.14 (10.254.0.14) 46.290 ms 45.467 ms 47.701 ms 15 10.52.1.10 (10.52.1.10) 44.798 ms 46.038 ms 48.682 ms 16 1.ATM10-1.IDGAUB7513.TR.deltacom.net (209.192.87.198) 48.998 ms 49.069 ms 49.670 ms <snip>
Certainly BBN, and probably DeltaCom, and anyone else on those previous 11 hops that allowed an RFC 1918 packet to transit. And you too for not filtering it. (Perhaps this is specifically a bogon test, and you've removed your filters, yes?)
Current thread:
- RFC 1918 Shawn McMahon (Jul 14)
- Re: RFC 1918 John Fraizer (Jul 14)
- Message not available
- Re: RFC 1918 Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 14)
- Re: RFC 1918 Bennett Todd (Jul 14)
- Re: RFC 1918 Gary E. Miller (Jul 14)
- Re: RFC 1918 Bennett Todd (Jul 14)
- Re: RFC 1918 Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: RFC 1918 Shawn McMahon (Jul 14)
- Re: RFC 1918 Danny McPherson (Jul 14)
- Re: RFC 1918 Steven M. Bellovin (Jul 14)
- Re: RFC 1918 Bennett Todd (Jul 14)
- Re: RFC 1918 Gary E. Miller (Jul 14)
- Re: RFC 1918 Michael Shields (Jul 14)
- Re: RFC 1918 Greg A. Woods (Jul 14)
- Re: RFC 1918 Shawn McMahon (Jul 14)