nanog mailing list archives
RE: bad idea?
From: "Richard A. Steenbergen" <ras () e-gerbil net>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 13:38:46 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Karyn Ulriksen wrote:
Riigghhhttttt..... But if the server goes down and the IP is unreachable, DNS will never know and all his structure goes for naught...
Thats actually a good thing, at least for the short-term. If the IP is down hard and isn't coming back up (for example, the server crashed), thats a different story. A short TTL works, if you don't mind it offsetting the benefits of DNS caching. Its an all around grody hack, but its still better then other alternatives. It also helps if the DNS "server" for this load balanced sub-domain is integrated with the box, for example a Foundry ServerIron which can perform health checks, and withdraw the announcement if its no longer viable to get answers from this server. As long as the grody-ness stays restricted to this confined area, and doesn't break anything else... I can live with it. -- Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/humble PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177 (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)
Current thread:
- RE: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron, (continued)
- RE: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron Brantley Jones (Jul 05)
- Re: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron John Hall (Jul 10)
- Message not available
- Re: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron Brantley Jones (Jul 06)
- RE: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron Dmitri Krioukov (Jul 06)
- Re: LoadBalancing products: Foundry ServerIron tony bourke (Jul 05)
- Re: bad idea? Adrian Chadd (Jul 05)
- Re: bad idea? Shawn McMahon (Jul 05)
- RE: bad idea? Richard A. Steenbergen (Jul 05)
- Re: bad idea? Matt Zimmerman (Jul 06)