nanog mailing list archives
Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks?
From: John Kristoff <jtk () depaul edu>
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2000 09:43:07 -0500
This form of "shunning" seems like an appropriate approach, but a little scary. What sorts of mechanisms will prevent temporary black holes and DoS attacks to get an otherwise cooperative organization black holed? It doesn't seem like the right long term approach, but it's something we've thought about doing in the past as a stop gap measure. John
Current thread:
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks?, (continued)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Chris Cappuccio (Jul 06)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Steve Sobol (Jul 06)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 06)
- RE: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Joe Shaw (Jul 07)
- A possible anodyne (was Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks?). Roland Dobbins (Jul 07)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? David Charlap (Jul 06)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Dan Hollis (Jul 06)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? John Kristoff (Jul 07)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Shawn McMahon (Jul 07)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Peter van Dijk (Jul 08)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Randy Bush (Jul 08)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Greg A. Woods (Jul 08)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Peter van Dijk (Jul 08)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Stephen Stuart (Jul 08)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Peter van Dijk (Jul 08)
- Re: RBL-type BGP service for known rogue networks? Stephen Stuart (Jul 08)