nanog mailing list archives
Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS
From: "Henry R. Linneweh" <linneweh () concentric net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 10:51:45 -0800
I think if ORBS read the RBL documents as a standard this entire argument would end and that all services which want to help combat spam should have the same policy based approach and that the parties involved get together and hammer out a policy acceptable to the NSP/ISP community and that prepackaged fixes for broked networks be available to implement, for the less technically inclined. Shawn McMahon wrote:
At 11:44 AM 1/19/2000 -0500, you wrote:ORBS cannot, by definition, have any "false positives".And yet, it does. There are IPs that are blocked in ORBS, but do not run an open relay. It's a demonstrable fact.
-- Thank you; |--------------------------------------------| | Thinking is a learned process so is UNIX | |--------------------------------------------| Henry R. Linneweh
Current thread:
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS [LONG], (continued)
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS [LONG] Forrest W. Christian (Jan 15)
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS [LONG] Greg A. Woods (Jan 15)
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS Greg A. Woods (Jan 14)
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS Randy Bush (Jan 14)
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS Greg A. Woods (Jan 14)
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS Steve Sobol (Jan 16)
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS Paul Vixie (Jan 16)
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS Steve Sobol (Jan 16)
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS Greg A. Woods (Jan 19)
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS Shawn McMahon (Jan 19)
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS Henry R. Linneweh (Jan 19)
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS Greg A. Woods (Jan 19)
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS Shawn McMahon (Jan 14)
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS Alex P. Rudnev (Jan 13)
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS Paul Vixie (Jan 14)
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS Greg A. Woods (Jan 14)
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS Alex P. Rudnev (Jan 15)
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS Greg A. Woods (Jan 15)
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS Alex P. Rudnev (Jan 15)