nanog mailing list archives
Re: Shock news - NANOG likely to carry less operational content
From: Alex Bligh <amb () gxn net>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 18:28:22 +0000
I never received any of those mailings. Never ever. Are specific people being targeted?
Has anyone virus checked these for worms? I care not, reading email on UNIX, but I suspect that's the cause of it. Possibly some innocent(s) on NANOG has an infected Windows machine that is spewing using an address book built from mails it has received - & you see more than one source as some people have now run the program. Else I guess someone has decided as NANOG spends a large % of its bandwidth discussing spam, we should have some of the real thing. Ha ha very funny. -- Alex Bligh GX Networks (formerly Xara Networks)
Current thread:
- Shock news - NANOG likely to carry less operational content Alex Bligh (Jan 14)
- Re: Shock news - NANOG likely to carry less operational content William Allen Simpson (Jan 14)
- Re: Shock news - NANOG likely to carry less operational content Kai Schlichting (Jan 14)
- Re: Shock news - NANOG likely to carry less operational content Alex Bligh (Jan 14)
- Re: Shock news - NANOG likely to carry less operational content Randy Bush (Jan 14)
- Re: Shock news - NANOG likely to carry less operational content Chris Josephes (Jan 14)
- Re: Shock news - NANOG likely to carry less operational content Kai Schlichting (Jan 14)
- Re: Shock news - NANOG likely to carry less operational content William Allen Simpson (Jan 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Shock news - NANOG likely to carry less operational content Sean Donelan (Jan 14)