nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm....
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2000 18:44:36 -0800
As Charles says, from what I've read of the CERT advisories, there is nothing proactive one can really do for these DDos attacks, besides securing machines from being hacked, correct?
yes, that is essential. but also, what has to be done is to go to all dedicated cpe and prevent source spoofing, see RFC 2267. [ do not be distracted by the smurf etc. red herring sub-discussions ] randy
Current thread:
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm...., (continued)
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Henry R. Linneweh (Feb 09)
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Joe Shaw (Feb 09)
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Travis Pugh (Feb 09)
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Dan Hollis (Feb 09)
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Joe Shaw (Feb 09)
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Wayne Bouchard (Feb 09)
- Message not available
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Hank Nussbacher (Feb 10)
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Wayne Bouchard (Feb 09)
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Mike Bird (Feb 09)
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... Randy Bush (Feb 09)
- Re: NANOG meeting subject of attack? Hmmmm.... robert (Feb 09)