nanog mailing list archives
Re: MAE-East Problems?
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank () att net il>
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2000 10:34:00 +0200
At 09:23 09/02/00 +0100, Jesper Skriver wrote: If Mae-East/Mae-West/Mae-Houston/Mae-LA stats were up to date (ends Nov 21, 1999), perhaps we could find a pattern related to the distributed DoS going on: http://www.mfsdatanet.com:80/MAE/east.stats.html -Hank
On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 06:54:04PM -0500, NANOG Mailing List wrote:Ahem: > > No problems getting to MAE-East. Just getting things THROUGH it. I'm reporting 20% loss THROUGH the MAE, not *TO* the MAE.Yes ? Why don't you show where the problem is, then it's easier to try to narrow the problem down to a specific switch - or to you port/router. /Jesper -- Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5456 Work: Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetworks) Private: Geek @ AS2109 (A much smaller network ;-) One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.
Current thread:
- MAE-East Problems? NANOG Mailing List (Feb 08)
- Re: MAE-East Problems? Robert E. Seastrom (Feb 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: MAE-East Problems? NANOG Mailing List (Feb 08)
- Re: MAE-East Problems? Jesper Skriver (Feb 09)
- Re: MAE-East Problems? Hank Nussbacher (Feb 09)
- Re: MAE-East Problems? Jesper Skriver (Feb 09)