nanog mailing list archives
Re: MAE-East Problems?
From: NANOG Mailing List <nanog () EnterZone Net>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2000 18:54:04 -0500 (EST)
Ahem: > > No problems getting to MAE-East. Just getting things THROUGH it. I'm reporting 20% loss THROUGH the MAE, not *TO* the MAE. On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Adam Rothschild wrote:
Hi, I'm a bit confused here. You're reporting 20% packet loss, and then pasted ping output indicating zero packet loss. What's the dilly? -adam On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 02:38:19PM -0500, NANOG Mailing List wrote:Is anyone else having problems with packet-loss through MAE-EAST? We're down 20% to MAE-E and I'm almost certain it is as result of packet-loss. No problems getting to MAE-East. Just getting things THROUGH it. core1-Col>en Password: core1-Col#term length 20 core1-Col#ping Protocol [ip]: Target IP address: vie1 Translating "vie1"...domain server (206.183.224.8) [OK] Repeat count [5]: 250 Datagram size [100]: Timeout in seconds [2]: Extended commands [n]: Sweep range of sizes [n]: Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 250, 100-byte ICMP Echoes to 206.183.226.36, timeout is 2 seconds: !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (250/250), round-trip min/avg/max = 20/25/36 ms John Fraizer EnterZone, Inc
Current thread:
- MAE-East Problems? NANOG Mailing List (Feb 08)
- Re: MAE-East Problems? Robert E. Seastrom (Feb 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: MAE-East Problems? NANOG Mailing List (Feb 08)
- Re: MAE-East Problems? Jesper Skriver (Feb 09)
- Re: MAE-East Problems? Hank Nussbacher (Feb 09)
- Re: MAE-East Problems? Jesper Skriver (Feb 09)