nanog mailing list archives
RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN?
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 11:29:20 -0800
That makes perfect sense to me...there is not a better way to protect a box from a DOS/hack than to only give it a private address.
this is a common fantasy. changing the its license place does not change the vulnerability of your car to an accident. randy
Current thread:
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN?, (continued)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Andrew Brown (Dec 29)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? John Fraizer (Dec 29)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Andrew Brown (Dec 29)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Daniel L. Golding (Dec 29)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Andrew Brown (Dec 29)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Simon Lyall (Dec 29)
- RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Deron J. Ringen (Dec 29)
- RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? John Fraizer (Dec 29)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Geoffrey Zinderdine (Dec 29)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Bill Fumerola (Dec 30)
- RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Randy Bush (Dec 31)
- RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Derek J. Balling (Dec 31)
- RE: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Randy Bush (Dec 31)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Stephen Stuart (Dec 31)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? John Fraizer (Dec 31)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Bill Woodcock (Dec 31)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Randy Bush (Dec 31)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Mark Mentovai (Dec 31)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Randy Bush (Dec 31)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? Andrew Brown (Dec 31)
- Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN? John Hawkinson (Dec 31)